Bill of Rights Defense Campaign

BILL OF RIGHTS Defense Committee - Working with communities to uphold the Bill of RightsWe the People
Working with communities to uphold the Bill of Rights
BORDC on Facebook  BORDC on MySpace  Add to Delicious  Recommend on Digg  Recommend on Reddit  Share on Furl    

Strategies for people dealing with local detention centers in their communities

From the New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee

Although there is currently an administration thrust to build ever-larger federal/state detention facilities, we think effective activism can still be directed at local facilities that have contracts with ICE. The basic organizing goal should be ending these contracts, on the principle that the fewer detention facilities available right now, the fewer detentions. In late December, 2005, when Passaic County (NJ) announced the end of their detention contract with ICE, scores of detainees were actually released either directly from Passaic County Jail or from neighboring facilities to make room for Passaic transfers.

Moreover, the Passaic County Sheriff explicitly "blamed" this change of policy on protests organized by activists, and more specifically on the kind of protests that combined actions inside AND outside the facility. We think he's right. In this case, the decision to close the facility came after a couple of years of tireless activism on both sides of the wall, and a couple of weeks after the detainees themselves circulated a petition demanding that the contract with ICE be ended.

Our experience is that such coordination starts with local protests on the outside demanding the termination of the contract and explaining the unconstitutional nature of these detentions, which are by definition without charges and often without legal recourse. At the same time it's important to reach out to detainees, visit them inside the jails, and speak if possible to their relatives, indeed to seek them out and get statements from them on their side of the detention experience, which is often full of severe hardship. Such efforts can and should be publicized by whatever means available: community meetings, rallies, flyers, press releases, letters/ stories in the press, a newsletter sent directly to detainees. Early on, our group brought a contingent of speakers to a regular County meeting, where we read graphic statements from detainees and offered a string of individual public comments demanding the end of the local contract. This tactic met with hostility at the time, but the long-term effect
was to put elected County officials on the defensive, along with their policy of seeking revenue from the suffering of imprisoned immigrants. And no one thereafter could claim they didn't know what was going on.

Detainees understandably tend to focus on the conditions of their detention--egregious physical and mental abuse, poor food, lack of medical care, etc.--rather than on the unconstitutionality and illegality of the detentions themselves. Often these complaints, especially in the wake of notorious abuse scandals elsewhere, become press triggers, so they can be useful. But for our purposes, we felt it was key that complaints of poor and inhumane treatment should always highlight detention itself as the source of the problem. We have urged detainees themselves to speak to this larger issue, and demand an end not just to the abusive conditions but to the local contract, encouraging them with the promise of support on the outside (and delivering on that promise as much as possible).

A single detainee willing to take this tack is often all you need to start a wave. Other detainees, we found, will often summon the courage to follow, and build a petition, or even mount a hunger strike. But whether the petition or detainee action speaks to abuse or to detention itself or both, we think it can and should be linked with the same petition circulating on the outside, especially among affected immigrant communities.

Obviously, all tactics should be cut to fit local circumstances. But we think the demand to end the contract, not just the specific abuses, and the coordination between detainee actions and outside supporters are key elements. A discussion list or other information exchange would also be useful to build morale and share experiences. We would gladly be part of it.

--Members of the New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee