Legislation of the 110th Congress (Archives)
Proposed Legislation of
the 110th Congress
109th Congress Archives
Feel free to contact members of Congress on any of the matters listed below.
Legislation Enacted
Bill Numbers: H.R.
979,
H.R. 980 and H.R.
982
Bill Status: All three resolutions were introduced
on February 13, 2008. H.R. 979 and 980 were combined into H.R.
982, which passed
the House by a vote of 222-32 on February 14, 2008.
Sponsors: H.R. 979 and 980, Rep. John Conyers (D-MI-14).
H.R. 982, Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY-28).
Co-sponsors:None.
These resolutions are the culmination of the work the House Judiciary Committee has done to investigate the unprecedented mass firings of U.S. attorneys by the Department of Justice in late 2006. Former White House counsel Harriet Miers was called to testify before Congress on her role in the firings, and she refused to appear. White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten refused to provide documents and emails to the House Judiciary Committee for its investigation.
On February 14, 2008, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 982, which holds Miers and Bolten in contempt of Congress and provides for the Judiciary Committee to intervene to enforce the subpoenas. The enforcement may be needed because Attorney General Mukasey told the Judiciary Committee he would not issue the subpoenas to Miers or Bolten, because they were following orders from the President.
View video of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking House members to vote for H.R. 982. Video of other House members' statements. Rep. John Boehner (R-OH-8) led a dramatic Republican walkout during debate on the resolution. Read more news reports about the attorney firings.
Bill Number:
S. 214
Status: Introduced on January 9, 2007. Referred to
the Senate Judiciary Committee. On February 12, 2007, it was
approved by the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 13-6. On March
20, it passed by a vote of 94-2.
Roll Call 81
Became Public
Law 110-34 when signed by the President on June 14, 2007.
Sponsor: Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
List
of Co-sponsors
This bill is related to H.R. 580, which was passed by the House 306-114 on May 22, 2007 with Roll Call 397
S 214 and H.R. 580 were written in response to recent firings by the Department of Justice of U.S. attorneys in various parts of the country, replaced by hand-picked Bush loyalists. This recent overhaul of U.S. Attorneys offices' leadership was ushered in by a little known provision in the March 2006 reauthorization of the PATRIOT Act that allows the Attorney General to skirt the Senate confirmation process by making indefinite interim appointments. S 214 seeks to amend U.S. Code to restore Congress' oversight in the appointment of U.S. attorneys.
Read Senator Dianne Feinstein's statement at a March 6 hearing on the fired U.S. Attorneys.
Bill Number:
H.R. 580
Status: Introduced January 19, 2007. Subcommittee
Hearings Held on March 6, 2007. Passed the House on March 26,
2007 by a vote of Roll
Call 189. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar
Sponsor: Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA-28th)
List
of Co-sponsors
Like S 214, H.R. 580 would alter the PATRIOT Reauthorization Act of 2006 by amending chapter 35 of title 28, United States Code, to provide for a 120-day limit to the term of a United States attorney appointed on an interim basis by the Attorney General.
Additional Information
- Inquiry Into Ouster of U.S. Attorneys Moves Toward Subpoenas at Justice Department (3/8/07)
- U.S. Attorney: I Was Forced to Resign (2/8/07)
- Firings of U.S. Attorneys Draws Senate's Attention (2/8/07)
- Congress Probes Departures of U.S. Attorneys (2/8/07)
Bill Number:
H.R. 1309
Related Bill:H.R.
1326
Status: Introduced on March 12, 2007. Passed by the
House on March 14 by a vote of 308-117. Roll
Call 144 H.R. 1309 was received in Senate and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Sponsor: Representative William Lacey Clay (D-MO-1st)
List
of Co-sponsors
This bill amends the Freedom of Information Act, restoring it to its state prior to Attorney General John Ashcroft's 2001 directive, impeding public disclosure of information. Ashcroft directed federal agencies to err on the side of withholding information. This bill would restore the "presumption of disclosure" in cases where there was a question about whether or not records should be released to the public.
Bill Number:
S 849
Status: Introduced on March 13, 2007 Read twice and
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. Placed on Senate
calendar No. 127 on April 30. Passed Senate on August 3, 2007
with amendments by unanimous consent. Sponsor: Senators
Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and John Cornyn (R-TX)
List
of Co-sponsors
A bi-partisan bill, which is similar to H.R. 1309. As chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Leahy held a hearing on S. 849 on March 14, entitled, "Open Government: Reinvigorating the Freedom of Information Act."
Originally, Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) blocked the Senate from considering the bill citing "uncharacteristically strong" opposition to the bill by the Justice Department.
Bill Number:
S 2488
Status: Introduced on December 14, 2007. Read twice,
and then a third time. Passed without amendment by unanimous
vote. On December 18, the House received the bill, suspended
the rules, and passed it by a voice vote. On December 19, it
was sent to the President.
Sponsor: Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
List
of Co-sponsors
This is a revised version of S. 849, which passed the Senate in August, but did not move in the House of Representatives. Senators John Cornyn (R-TX) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ) co-sponsored the legislation. Senator Cornyn said, " Passage of these long-overdue open government reforms is a victory for the American people. This sweeping legislation to let more sunshine in government will be one of the signature achievements of this Congress. Our bipartisan bill holds politicians and bureaucrats accountable in an age of ever-expanding size and scope of government. "
On October 12, 2001, then Attorney General John Ashcroft issued a memorandum informing government agencies that they should err on the side of releasing too little information, rather than complying with public Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Ashcroft committed to defending agencies that restricted public information, if challenged in court. This bill does a 180-degree turn from Ashcrofts policies, by penalizing agencies that don't comply with FOIA requests within a 20-day period of time. Government contractors who hold nonproprietary information would also be subject to the law.
According to Secrecy News, "For all of its procedural virtues, the OPEN Government Act does not touch the root of government secrecy, namely the decision to withhold information. The Act does not repeal or modify any of the more than one hundred statutory exemptions from disclosure under the FOIA. And it does not address the proper scope or application of the classification system. That is a task for another day."
- Senator Leahy's Statement December 18, 2007
- Congress Eases Access to Government Records December 18, 2007
- Congress Widens Freedom of Information Act December 18, 2007
- FOIA Bill Passes Congress, Awaits President's Signature December 19, 2007
Intelligence and Intelligence Oversight
Bill Number:
H Res 35
Status: Passed/agreed to in House on January 9, 2007.
By recorded vote: 239 - 188. (Roll
Call 13)
Sponsor: Representative Dave Obey (R-WI-7th)
Statement of Rep. Dave Obey on January 8, 2007 about this bill.
Bill Number:
H.R. 1
Related Bill: S.
4
Status: Passed House of Representatives on January
9, 2007. By recorded vote: 299-128. (Roll
Call 15)
Conference Report passed by Senate on July 26, 2007 by a vote
of 85-8. Roll
Call 285
Conference Report passed by House on July 27, 2007 by a vote
of 371 to 40. Roll
Call 757.
Signed by the President on August 3, 2007. Public Law 110-53.
Sponsor: Representative Bennie G. Thompson (R-MS-2nd)
List
of Co-sponsors
There is concern that H.R. 1 contains some hidden and troubling provisions, such as the fusion center programs in Title VII. Following are four articles, including one from the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation, expressing concern about some of the bill's less well-known provisions.
Additional Information on Fusion Centers:
Spies Among Us, a 2005 background article on Fusion Centers by US News and World Report
9/11 Bill Contains Little Known Provisions, a U.S. News and World Report on H.R. 1
States Setting Up Own Anti-Terror Centers, a Boston Globe report
100-Hours Homeland Security Bill Not Ready for Prime Time by the Heritage Foundation
A positive outcome of the passage of H.R. I, according to the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), is that it's a step forward for Congress, since the legislative body began debating the issue three decades ago. The legislation "will require -- not merely recommend -- public disclosure of the total national intelligence budget....it would lead to the first authorized disclosure of current U.S. intelligence spending since the aggregate budgets were disclosed in 1997 ($26.6 billion) and 1998 ($26.7 billion) in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by the Federation of American Scientists. (Those figures included spending on "national" as well as "tactical" intelligence.)" Read excerpts from the conference report regarding the intelligence budget.
Bill Number:
S 4
Bill Title: A bill to reaffirm the authority of the
Comptroller General to audit and evaluate the programs, activities,
and financial transactions of the intelligence community, and
for other purposes.
Related Bill:
H.R. 1
Status: On March 13, 2007, passed Senate with an amendment
by Yea-Nay Vote. 60 - 38. Roll
Call 73.
Sponsor: Senator Harry Reid (D-NV)
List
of Co-sponsors
S.4, does not correct the emerging problems with the president's Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) being too closely allied with the administration. S 4 and H.R. 1 both expand fusion centers without providing any meaningful privacy protections (for example, it requires training to protect privacy as recommended by the PCLOB, which has repeatedly praised the illegal NSA wiretapping program).
S. 4 implements almost all of the remaining 9/11 Commission recommendations, but tucks in some provisions amid its 230+ pages, such as asking for a presidential report on doing away with privacy protections for US persons. Those provisions do not inspire confidence, from a civil liberties perspective. Unfortunately, this bill misses some important opportunities to add genuine enhancements for privacy and civil liberties.
Read Creating a Real Civil Liberties Oversight Board by Isaac Kaufman, of the Minnesota Bill of Rights Defense Committee.
On March 2, Senator John Kyl (R-AZ) introduced an amendment to S. 4, which would penalize employees of the House or Senate or other authorized personnel who knowingly disclose classified information that is contained in a report to Congress
The amendment when originally proposed in late February which seemed to be a threat to whistleblowers, drew strong opposition among civil liberties advocates because of its threat to whistleblowers. Open the Government and Sunshine in Government voices opposition to the amendment before it was introduced. As a result, Kyl modified the amendment and re-introduced a modified version on March 2.
Open Government Letter to Senators Leahy and Specter
Sunshine in Government Letter
Intelligence Community Audit Act of 2007
Bill Number:
S 82
Bill Title: A bill to reaffirm the authority of the
Comptroller General to audit and evaluate the programs, activities,
and financial transactions of the intelligence community, and
for other purposes.
Status: Read twice and referred to the Select Committee
on Intelligence on January 4, 2007.
Sponsor:Senator Daniel K. Akaka (D-HI)
List
of Co-sponsors
Additional Information: Statement by Sen. Akaka on the Senate floor.
Bill Number: H.R.
2638 -- Homeland Security Appropriations
Status: Passed House June 15, 2007.
Passed Senate July 26, 2007 with amendment relating to REAL
ID by a vote of 89-4. Roll
Call 282
House and Senate are reconciling differences between the two bills. Senate Conferees: Byrd; Inouye; Leahy; Mikulski; Kohl; Murray; Landrieu; Lautenberg; Nelson NE; Cochran; Gregg; Stevens; Specter; Domenici; Shelby; Craig; Alexander. House has not named conferees.
In 2005, when the REAL ID Act was introduced, the Senate escaped having to vote on it, because the amendment adding REAL ID came in the House, during a must-pass troop appropriations, tsunami, Hurricane Katrina relief bill. So, 2007 marks the first time the Senate has voted on REAL ID, affirming Senate Amendment 2406 offered by Senator Max Baucus (D-MT). The amendment prohibits the use of funds for planning, testing, piloting, or developing a national identification card. Montana is one of six states, which voted to reject REAL ID, and dozens more, including Arkansas that are still considering a state response.
For More Information:
- Questions Persist About National ID Card Plan, July 25, 2007
- NH Governor Signs Bill That Rejects Federal REAL ID Law, July 5, 2007
- Oklahoma Legislation Rejecting REAL ID, June 19, 2007
- SC Decides to Dump REAL ID Program, June 14, 2007
- Washington Governor Signs Legislation Rejecting REAL ID, April 19, 2007
- Montana Moves to Reject REAL ID, January 30, 2007
- Maine Rejects Real ID, January 25, 2007
Bill Number: H.R.
6304, S.
2248
Status: FISA Amendments Act of 2008 passed the House
on June 20, followed by the Senate on July 9. President Bush
signed it into law on July 10.
Sponsors: Senator John D. Rockefeller IV (D-WV),
Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX)
Co-sponsors
Originally introduced in October 2007, the FISA Amendments Act went through many revisions and votes prior to becoming law, including Judiciary Committee hearings in October 2007 and passage of a previous version by the Senate (but not the house) in February 2008.
In May 2008, Senator Kit Bond (R-MO) issued a proposal that he believed to be a compromise on warrantless surveillance. Under this proposal, the telecommunications companies accused of breaking the law by providing the government with personal subscriber information without receiving a warrant would be let off the hook. Lawsuits against them would be sent to a federal court that would not review whether the companies actually broke the law, but would instead ask whether the companies followed what the Bush administration told them was the law. If the President told them his request for information was legal, the companies will not be held responsible for violating their customers' privacy rights.
The FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Senator Bond's "compromise," was passed 293-129 by the House on June 20, 2008. The Senate passed the bill on July 9 by a vote of 69 to 28. Three amendments that would have mitigated the harmful effects of the bill were rejected:
- An amendment introduced by Senators Feingold, Dodd, and Patrick to remove the immunity provision (32 to 66).
- The Specter amendment, which would have required federal courts to determine whether the wiretapping program was constitutional before granting immunity to the telecommunications companies (37 to 61).
- The Bingaman amendment, which would have halted pending lawsuits against telecommunications companies until 90 days after Congress received the Inspectors General report on the legality of the President’s surveillance program (42 to 56).
Bill Number: S.
1927
Status: Introduced on August 1, 2007. Read for the
first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar.
Sponsor: Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
Co-sponsors
Passed by Congress on August 3 and 4, and signed into law by President Bush on August 5.
In the House, the August 4 vote was 227-183. In the Senate, the August 3 vote was 60-28.
Many good speeches were made on the floor of the House and Senate defending the Bill of Rights, and denouncing S. 1927 for purporting to protect Americans from terrorism, while devising more ways to legalize the White House's illegal spy programs. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) stated the obvious -- that the President broke the law by conducting illegal wiretaps after September 11, but Republicans, forced him to revise his words for the Congressional record. Still Nadler said, "I retain my opinion." It is a grievous time indeed, when the President's crimes cannot be publicly mentioned in Congress, when they are pretended away by passage of the "Protect America Act."
Click here for talking points about this bill, which is a seismic shift in how surveillance is conducted in the U.S.
Legislation Proposed but Not Passed
Bill Number:
S 236
Bill Title: To require reports to Congress on Federal
agency use of data mining.
Status: Introduced by Senators Russell Feingold (D-WI),
John Sununu (R-NH), Daniel Akaka (D-HI) and Patrick Leahy
(D-VT) on January 10, 2007 and referred to the Judiciary Committee.
On March 15, the Judiciary Committee considered the bill,
and held a mark-up session. Reported out of committee by Senator
Leahy on June 4 and placed on Senate calendar. No. 184.
List
of Co-sponsors
Additional Information: Statement by Senator Feingold on the Senate floor.
Bill Number: S.
Res 22
Status: Submitted January 10, 2007 and referred to the Committee
on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. On June 13, 2007, it
was favorably reported out of the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs without amendment.
Sponsor: Senator Susan Collins (R-ME)
List
of Co-sponsors
Senator Collins' resolution is an effort to clarify a bill she co-sponsored, which passed in the waning days of the 109th Congress (H.R. 6407, the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act). In response to President Bush's recent signing statement which asserts the right of the President to open mail without a warrant, Senator Collins said, "I want to be perfectly clear: Nothing in the Postal Reform Act, nor the President’s signing statement alters the privacy and civil liberties protections provided to a person who sends or receives sealed mail. Mail sealed against inspection is entitled to the strongest possible protections against physical searches. With only very limited exceptions, the government needs a court-issued warrant before it can search mail.”"
Additional Information
Bill Number: H.R.
1255 (House); S.
886 (Senate)
Status: Introduced on March 9, 2007. Passed the House
on March 14, 2007 by a 333-93 vote. Roll
Call 143
In the Senate -- Introduced on March 14, 2007. Assigned to
Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. Reported
out of committee on June 20 by Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT)
with amendment. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar No.
212.
Sponsor: In the House: Representative Henry Waxman
(D-CA-30th)
In the Senate: Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM)
List
of House Co-sponsors
List
of Senate Co-sponsors
This is a bi-partisan measure that repeals Executive Order 13233, issued by President Bush in 2001, which closed presidential records from public view. Ironically, the presidential records of former President George H.W. Bush would have been among the first released in 2001, had his son, George W. Bush not issued the executive order.
Watch video of March 1 hearing of the Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census, and National Archives on the Presidential Records Act.
Bill Number:
H.R. 264
Status: Introduced on January 5, 2007. Referred
to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Sponsors: Representative Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX-18th)
List
of Co-sponsors
This bill addresses the arguably overused executive practice of issuing an extraordinary number of signing statements, exerting presidential authority over bills passed Congress. Read more about the effect of recent signing statements.
Bill Numbers: S.
513 (Senate);
H.R. 869 (House)
Status:
In the Senate -- Read twice; referred to the Armed Services Committee 2/7/07. Senate Judiciary Hearings held on April 24, 2007.
In the House -- Referred to the House Armed Services Committee
2/7/07
Sponsors: In the Senate -- Senator Patrick
Leahy (D-VT)
In
the House -- Representative Tom Davis (R-VA-11th)
List
of Co-sponsors for S. 513
List
of Co-sponsors for H.R. 869
This bill is a bi-partisan effort to carve out a troubling piece of the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007, which gave the President power to command the National Guard. Senator Leahy's bill would restore that command to the governor of each state. A nearly identical bill, H.R. 869 has been introduced in the House of Representatives by Republican Tom Davis from Virginia.
Bill Numbers: H.R.
3045 (House); S.
1747 (Senate)
Status:
In the House: Introduced on July 16, 2007 and referred to
the House Judiciary Committee.
In the Senate: Introduced on June 29, 2007 and referred to
the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Sponsor:
In the House: Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH-1)
In the Senate: Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA)
List
of House Co-sponsors
List
of Senate Co-sponsors
This bill, introduced in identical version in both House and Senate, attempts to prevent Presidential Signing Statements from taking on the force of law, as occasionally used by courts in determining the intent of the law. Congress wants to hold that distinction for itself through this legislation.
Full text is available through the Bill Summary page (above), but here is a quote from the legislation describing its intent: "Much more recently, some courts have begun using presidential signing statements as a source of authority in the interpretation of Acts of Congress. This judicial use of presidential signing statements is inappropriate, because it in effect gives these statements the force of law. As the Supreme Court itself has explained, Article I, section 7, of the Constitution provides a `single, finely wrought and exhaustively considered, procedure' for the making of Federal law. I.N.S. v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 951 (1983). Presidential signing statements are not passed by both Houses of Congress pursuant to Article I, section 7, so they are not the supreme law of the land. It is inappropriate, therefore, for courts to rely on presidential signing statements as a source of authority in the interpretation of Acts of Congress."
Bill Number:
S. 1469
Status: Introduced May 23, 2007, read twice and referred
to the Committee on Armed Services.
Sponsor: Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA)
List
of Co-sponsors
This bill requires the closure of the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba starting within 120 days of its enactment. The bill requires that:
- all funding to Guantánamo be cut off, except funds used to transfer detainees
- if charged or sentenced, detainees be transferred to Fort Leavenworth
- if uncharged, detainees be transferred back to their home countries or other nations where they are not at risk of torture
Read Bill text.
Read an article by the ACLU concerning the bill and an article in which the ACLU ties the recent suicide at Guantánamo to a need for the passage of S. 1469.
Bill Number:
H.R. 2212
Status: Introduced May 8, 2007, referred to the House
Committee on Armed Services.
Sponsor: Representative Jane Harman (D-CA)
List
of Co-sponsors
The bill is the House companion legislation to the Senate bill introduced by Senator Feinstein (D-CA), S 1249 discussed above.
Read Bill text.
Read a press release on Representative Harman's website.
Read an article about the bill from The Jurist.
Bill Number: H.R.
2826
Status: Introduced 6/22/07. Referred to the Committee on
the Judiciary, and the Committee on Armed Services. Hearing
held on July 26, 2007 with witnesses, including Stephen
Abraham, Lt. Colonel in the US Army Reserves, who has questioned
the fairness of procedures in the Combatant Status Review Tribunals.
Sponsor: Rep. Ike Skelton (D-MO-4)
List
of Co-sponsors
H.R. 2826 proposes to restore the right of habeas corpus to all detainees housed at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
Bill Number: H.R.
267
Status: Introduced January 5, 2007. Referred to the
House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors: Representative Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX-18th)
List
of Co-sponsors
This bill amends title 28, United States Code, to repeal the restriction on the jurisdiction of courts, justices, and judges to hear or consider applications for writs of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of certain aliens detained by the United States. It is related to Senate Bill 185, co-sponsored by Senators Specter and Leahy, though the two bills are not identical.
Bill Number: H.R.
1189
Status: Introduced February 16, 2007. Referred to
the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committees
on the Judiciary, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker.
Sponsor: Representative David Wu (D-OR-1st)
List
of Co-sponsors
This two-sentence bill is aimed at one part of the Military Commissions Act -- to guarantee the right of habeas corpus to all U.S. residents. Nothing in the act "shall affect the right of any resident of the United States of America to habeas corpus." Though some say that Wu's bill is unnecessary, others recall that immediately after the passage of the Military Commissions Act, the Bush Administration announced that the President can and will use the bill to indefinitely detain non-citizens in the United States.
Wu remembers as a six-year-old when people "disappeared" as Japanese-Americans were imprisoned in the U.S. during World War II. He said, ""I remember people talking about folks who were taken away in the dead of night.""
Additional Information:
Bill Number:
H.R. 1415
Status: Introduced on March 8, 2007 and referred
to Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committees
on the Judiciary, and Foreign Affairs.
Sponsor: Representatives Jerrold Nadler (D-NY-8th)
and Jane Harman (D-CA-36th)
List
of Co-sponsors
Like S. 576, the Restoring the Constitution Act of 2007 in the Senate, H.R. 1415 selects a number of provisions from the Military Commissions Act for overhaul.
- It restores habeas corpus,
- Narrows the definition of enemy combatant,
- Restricts the government from conducting torture and from using torture to compel testimony that can be used in court,
- Makes it clear the U.S. government must abide by the Geneva Conventions,
- Ensures that regardless of rank, no U.S. personnel can commit torture without consequences.
Bill Number:
S 576
Status: Introduced on February 13, 2007, read twice
and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Sponsor: Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT)
List
of Co-sponsors
The bill's purpose is to restore the right of habeas corpus and other constitutional protections that were stripped via the 2006 Military Commissions Act.
Additional Information
- Read statement from Senator Dodd, as he introduced this bill along with co-sponsors Russ Feingold (D-WI), Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Robert Menendez (R-NJ).
- View Dodd's statement via broadband or dial-up.
- Read text of S 576.
- Jurist, Dodd Introduces Bill to Restore Habeas Corpus (2/14/07)
- Secrecy News, Tempo of Congressional Oversight Increases (2/14/07)
- Washington Post, Bill Would Restore Detainees' Rights, Define Combatants (2/13/07)
Bill Number: H.R.
1416
Status: Introduced March 8, 2007. Referred to the
House Committee on the Judiciary, and to the Committee on
Armed Services.
Sponsors: Representatives Jerrold Nadler (D-NY-8th)
and Jane Harman (D-CA-36th)
List
of Co-sponsors
This bill is similar to the Habeas Corpus Restoration Act of 2007 introduced in the Senate, which seeks to restore habeas corpus.
Rep. Nadler, chair of the Judiciary Committee's subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, has promised to hold hearings on H.R. 1416 to move this bill out of committee and into Congressional action.
Read Statement by Rep. Nadler on H.R. 1416.
Bill Number:
S 185
Sponsors: Senators Arlen Specter (R-PA) and Patrick
Leahy (D-VT)
Status: Introduced on January 4, 2007. On June 7,
it passed the Senate Judiciary Committee by a vote of 11-8
(with Specter as the lone Republican supporter) and on June
26, placed on Senate Legislative Calendar No. 220.
List
of co-sponsors
This bill restores habeas corpus for those detained by the United States. It is similar to, but not identical to H.R. 267, a bill sponsored in the House by Representative Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX-18th).
Unfortunately, restoration of habeas corpus alone will not fix what's wrong with the Military Commissions Act. Much more must be addressed, including the President's sole authority for naming "enemy combatants," the President's sole authority for interpreting Geneva Conventions, the use of evidence gained through torture and coercion, and allowing individuals to be held indefinitely without trial.
Additional Information:
- Statement by Sen. Specter on the Senate floor.
- Download a flyer that explains what needs to be done to fix the Military Commissions Act. (PDF, Word)
Bill Number: H.R.
2543
Status: Introduced May 24, 2007, referred to the
House Committee on Armed Services and the House Committee
on the Judiciary. On June 25, 2007, referred to the Subcommittee
on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Sponsor: Representative Loretta Sanchez (D-CA)
List
of Co-sponsors
The bill amends the Military Commissions Act of 2006 by defining the term "unlawful enemy combatant," excluding evidence obtained by coercion, and providing some habeas corpus protections.
Read Bill
text.
Bill Number:
H.R. 1117
Status: Introduced 2/16/07. Referred to the Committee
on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently
determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration
of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
committee concerned.
Sponsor: Rep. Thomas H. Allen (D-ME-1st)
List
of Co-sponsors
The purpose of this bill is to repeal title II of the REAL ID Act of 2005, to reinstitute section 7212 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which provides States additional regulatory flexibility and funding authorization to more rapidly produce tamper- and counterfeit-resistant driver's licenses and to protect privacy and civil liberties by providing interested stakeholders on a negotiated rulemaking with guidance to achieve improved 21st century licenses to improve national security.
Bill Number: S
563
Status:Introduced on 2/13/07. Read twice and referred
to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Sponsor: Senator Susan Collins (R-ME)
List
of Co-sponsors
The purpose of this bill is to extend the deadline by which State identification documents shall comply with certain minimum standards under REAL ID.
Some conservative groups, such as the CATO Institute, have accused Senator Collins of proposing a delay in implementation in order to save REAL ID. According to CATO, delaying implementation helps a national ID go forward by giving the companies and organizations that sustain themselves on these kinds of projects time to shake the federal money tree and get this $11 billion surveillance mandate funded. Click here to read related article from the CATO Institute.
Even the Bush Administration has signed on to the delay tactic, as evidenced by this Washington Post article.
Bill Number:
S. 717
Status:Introduced on February 28, 2007, read twice
and referred to Senate Judiciary Committee.
Sponsors: Senators Daniel Akaka (D-HI) and John Sununu
(R-NH)
List
of Co-sponsors
Senators Akaka and Sununu teamed up in a bi-partisan effort to roll back provisions of REAL ID in the 109th Congress, and have reprised that bill in the 110th. It is praised by civil liberties groups as one that will add important safeguards regarding privacy and civil liberties to the Real ID Act. Click here to read ACLU news release on S. 717.
Torture and Extraordinary Rendition
Bill Number: S 1943
Status: Introduced on August 2, 2007 and referred to the
Committee on Judiciary.
Sponsor: Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA)
Co-sponsors
Bill Number:
H.R. 1352
Status: Introduced on March 6, 2007 and referred
to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Sponsor:Representative Edward J. Markey (D-MA-7th)
List
of Co-sponsors
The purpose of H.R. 1352 is to prohibit the return or other transfer of persons by the United States, for the purpose of detention, interrogation, trial, or otherwise, to countries where torture or other inhuman treatment of persons occurs.
Additional Information:
- Read Rep. Markey's Fact Sheet on Rendition.
- Read list of 44 original co-sponsors.
- Read Rep. Markey's Statement about H.R. 1352.
- Read news article Democrats Renew Arar Fight March 6, 2007.
- Read news article Markey bill to ban 'extraordinary rendition' aimed at stopping torture March 6, 2007.
Bill Number:
H.R. 2082
Status: Introduced in House May 1, 2007. Passed House
May 11, 2007 225-197
Passed Senate on October 3, 2007 by unanimous consent. Sent
to Conference Committee. Thirty
retired admirals and generals had written a letter in
mid-December, urging Congress to ignore Bush's
threat to veto the bill and to pass legislation to ban
waterboarding. House passed (222-199)
a version on December 13, 2007 with a provision prohibiting
the use of any interrogation technique not found in the Army
Field Manual. On February 13, 2008, the Senate
approved the conference report, 51-45 with the interrogation
procedure prohibition intact. On March 8, 2008, the President
fulfilled his promise to veto
the bill. On March 11, a House vote of 225-188
failed to achieve the two-thirds majority needed to override
the veto.
Sponsor: Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX-16th)
Co-sponsors
The bill includes Section 327, which limits interrogation techniques. Here is the exact wording:
- (a) Limitation- No individual in the custody or under the effective control of an element of the intelligence community or instrumentality thereof, regardless of nationality or physical location, shall be subject to any treatment or technique of interrogation not authorized by the United States Army Field Manual on Human Intelligence Collector Operations.
- (b) Instrumentality Defined- In this section, the term `instrumentality', with respect to an element of the intelligence community, means a contractor or subcontractor at any tier of the element of the intelligence community.
Bill Number: S. 1876
Status: Introduced on July 25, 2007 and referred to Senate
Judiciary Committee.
Sponsor: Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE)
List of Co-sponsors
A bill to prohibit extraterritorial detention and rendition, except under limited circumstances, to modify the definition of "unlawful enemy combatant" for purposes of military commissions, and to extend statutory habeas corpus to detainees.
Senator Biden is chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. A hearing on "Extraordinary Rendition, Extraterritorial Detention, And Treatment Of Detainees: Restoring Our Moral Credibility And Strengthening Our Diplomatic Standing" was held on July 26, 2007, with these witnesses:
- Tom Malinowski, Human Rights Watch
- Major General Paul Eaton, USA (Ret.), former Commanding General of the Office of Security Transition in Iraq
- Dr. Philip Zelikow, History Professor at the University of Virginia
- Dr. Daniel Byman, Director, Center for Peace and Security Studies at Georgetown University
Bill Number: H.R.
985
Status: Introduced February 12, 2007. Passed the
House on March 14 by a vote of 331-94. Roll
Call 153. On March 15, 2007, it was received in the Senate,
read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs.
Sponsor: Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-CA-30th)
List
of Co-sponsors
This bill would amend title 5, United States Code, clarifying which disclosures of information are protected from prohibited personnel practices and requiring a statement in nondisclosure policies, forms, and agreements to the effect that such policies, forms, and agreements are consistent with certain disclosure protections.
Additional Information:
- Read Testimony from February 13, 2007 hearing in the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
- View a trailer for the film "Kill the Messenger," about former FBI employee Sibel Edmonds' whistleblowing on FBI work practices and security breaches pre-9/11.
Bill Number: H.R. 3138
Status: Introduced July 24, 2007 and referred to both the
House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees.
Sponsor: Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM-1st)
List
of Cosponsors
Rep. Heather Wilson's bill is one page in length, but makes subtle yet far-reaching changes to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Though she merely defines "electronic surveillance," the definition itself suggests that the National Security Agency (NSA) can continue its secret programs that tap the phone and email conversations of U.S. residents simply because what they're doing will no longer be considered "electronic surveillance" if H.R. 3138 is passed. It gives the NSA the ability to determine what's a domestic call, and what is not.
As long as you're not the subject of a search, you should feel relief, right? Wrong. According to H.R. 3138, as long as the government doesn't target a specific person with "electronic surveillance," it should be able to search anyone's phone and email conversations. This bill is being given a hard push before the August recess, with the assumption that any member of Congress who doesn't vote for it isn't willing to do all that it takes to stop terrorism, even though the Administration has refused repeatedly to provide key information to Congress on its NSA wiretapping program(s).
Additional Information:
- Bush Wants Terrorism Law Updated Washington Post, July 28, 2007
- Bush Administration Withholds Key Information on Surveillance Raw Story July 25, 2007
- Most Wanted Surveillance Documents, Center for Democracy and Technology
- Most Wanted Surveillance Answers, Center for Democracy and Technology
Bill Number:
H.R. 11
Status: Introduced on January 4, 2007. Referred
to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security
on 2/2/07.
Sponsors: Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA-29th)
and Representative Jeff Flake (R-AZ-6th)
List
of Co-sponsors
This bill reiterates that chapters 119 and 121 of title 18, United States Code, and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 are the exclusive means by which domestic electronic surveillance may be conducted.
Additional Information:
Bill Number: S
139
Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee
on the Judiciary on January 4, 2007.
Sponsor: Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY)
List
of Co-sponsors
The purpose of S 139 is to expedite review by the Supreme Court of the warrantless electronic surveillance program of the National Security Agency.
Bill Number: S
187
Status: Read twice and referred to the Senate Judiciary
Committee on January 4, 2007.
Sponsor: Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA)
List
of Co-sponsors
S 187 is a bill to provide sufficient resources to permit electronic surveillance of United States persons for foreign intelligence purposes to be conducted pursuant to individualized court-issued orders for calls originating in the United States, to provide additional resources to enhance oversight and streamline the procedures of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, to ensure review of the Terrorist Surveillance Program by the United States Supreme Court.
Additional Information: Statement by Sen. Specter on the Senate floor.
Bill Number:
S. 1114
Status: Introduced on April 16, 2007, read twice
and referred to Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsor: Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) with Senator
Arlen Specter (R-PA)
List
of Co-sponsors
Major Provisions of S 1114:
Attempts to close some of the loopholes used by the Bush Administration to ignore FISA as the "exclusive means by which electronic surveillance may be conducted."
Grants significant latitude to the Department of Justice to conduct emergency surveillance without using FISA -- extending from 3 days to 7 days the amount of time it can conduct surveillance without a warrant and extending from 15 to 30 days the amount of time the executive branch is allowed to conduct surveillance without a warrant, 1) in a national emergency, 2) after a Congressional declaration of war, or 3) with Congressional authorization to use military force.
Requires the President to brief Congressional intelligence committees on the so-called "Terrorist Surveillance Program," (TSP) commonly known as warrantless wiretapping -- and to report to Congress any other program that involves electronic surveillance.
Provides a means for the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of the TSP or any other such electronic surveillance program.
Allows the Attorney General to appoint individuals in the FBI and National Security Agency to approve electronic surveillance warrants on an emergency basis.
S. 1114 clearly poses an alternative to recent Bush Administration plans, announced only days before S. 1114 was introduced in Congress. The administration hopes to reconstruct FISA in ways that would further expand executive powers, proposing to:
- monitor foreign nationals without approval from the FISA Court;
- lower the standards of proof required for obtaining phone call and email information through FISA Court orders;
- extend FISA surveillance warrants from 120 days to one year;
- indemnify phone companies from privacy invasion lawsuits related to their cooperation with warrantless wiretapping programs; and
- allow intelligence officers to conduct surveillance without a FISC court order for one week in emergency situations (previously a 72-hour permission).
For more information on Bush Administration plans to expand FISA see these articles:
- Bush Administration Urges Changes to FISA (Apr 20 - NPR)
- U.S. Intelligence Chief Circulates Proposed FISA Amendments (Apr 11 - Jurist)
Other Resources
Contact
Congress
Rights Working Group
BORDC Action Alerts archive
BORDC Resources on Related Issues
Analyses of current laws


