The Return of COINTELPRO: Government Infiltration of Activist Groups

Surveillance of First Amendment protected speech and political activism unfortunately boasts a long and sordid history in the United States, well before its recent continuation under the Obama administration. Such surveillance and infiltration deeply threatens constitutional rights and should raise alarms, especially given its reflection of systemic problems, rather than isolated abuses by particular over-zealous law enforcement officials.

BORDC will soon release the Human Rights Abuse Database (HRAD), capturing these and other infringements of civil rights and liberties by counterterrorism authorities. This post collects just a few of the many stories documenting unconstitutional government invasion of First Amendment protected activity.

Read a brief history of FBI surveillance of activist groups during the “war on terror” after the jump.

Infiltration of activist groups was predictable based on Bush-era policies. Soon after the 9/11 attacks, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft authorized the FBI to dramatically expand its domestic surveillance activities, before further expanding its authority in 2003. Ostensibly crafted to enhance counterterrorism efforts, the resulting surveillance came to serve political purposes as it was routinely directed against activist groups and individuals expressing opposition to the Bush administration.

Many law enforcement agencies engaged in surveillance of activist groups. In some cases, local or state police monitored lawful activity, while in others FBI agents acted through a Joint Terrorism Task Force. In some cases, even military personnel appear to have been involved.

Surveillance itself took a variety of forms: government agents have

  • monitored activist websites,
  • sent agents to monitor and record the identities of individuals attending lawful rallies and demonstrations,
  • conducted interrogations of group members or people who attended events,
  • compiled databases of names, organizations, and activities, and
  • posed undercover as members of groups pursuing lawful activities in order to gain inside information on the groups’ activities.

At a time when the specter of genuine terrorism loomed large in our nation’s priorities, federal and local law enforcement agencies squandered time and resources conducting unconstitutional surveillance of peaceful activist groups. According to government documents, surveillance under the guise of counterterrorism violated the rights of individuals in as many as 150 organizations, including Greenpeace, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), various Muslim charities, and a Catholic Workers Group that fights poverty. The government conducted this surveillance without any evidence of criminal activity.

Unfortunately, the exact scope of the FBI’s domestic surveillance of activist groups remains unclear. Though the FBI has released thousands of pages detailing anti-dissident surveillance, these have been heavily redacted, in many cases with only the names of particular groups or organizations visible. But the picture painted by the released documents is one of broad abuse by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies, which have targeted peaceful groups for political purposes. The “war on terror” has, in effect, criminalized dissent.

2002
FBI uses “source” to spy on Greenpeace. Since at least 2002, Greenpeace had been the subject of surveillance and intelligence gathering by the FBI. Highly redacted FBI documents reveal the use of a “source” within the organization from whom government agents collected information about peaceful protest activities.

2003
Antiwar group Peace Fresno was infiltrated by the FBI for two years. Aaron Kilner, the Joint Terrorism Task Force agent who spied on the group’s regular meetings, was killed in a motorcycle accident in 2003, and his obituary photo alerted Peace Fresno group members to his true identity as a government agent who had infiltrated their meetings. Fresno County Sheriff Richard Pierce admitted in March 2006 that he had placed an agent in the peace group to gather information. However, under a deal reached with the state attorney general, no information from that investigation will be released.

JTTF and antiwar protestors in Iowa. The Drake University chapter of the National Lawyer’s Guild (NLG) came under suspicion after it organized a November 2003 campus anti-war protest and helped prepare a peaceful demonstration at the Iowa National Guard Headquarters. In February 2004, the U.S. Attorney subpoenaed the university president and four people who attended the event and issued a gag order. A local sheriff’s deputy, identifying himself as a member of the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), served the subpoenas. After the NLG filed a motion to quash the subpoenas, the FBI withdrew the subpoenas and dropped the case.

Two local police officers in Oakland infiltrate an anti-war group. In 2003, two officers infiltrated an anti-war protest group in order to spy on the group’s activities and influence its actions. The two officers were even elected as leaders of the group.

2004
New York City police and the 2004 Republican National Convention. In 2004, the New York City Police Department spied on activist groups throughout the country and co-opted other police agencies for information on peace activists planning protests at the Republican National Convention. FBI agents visited many of these activists prior to the convention and discouraged them from attending.

2005
PETA audited, members interrogated. An ACLU Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request elicited a heavily redacted document from the Department of Justice, which revealed that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) was under surveillance because it was suspected of ties to the Animal Liberation Front. The suspicions were unfounded. PETA was audited twice and its members were interrogated, often for hours.

2006
Undercover police spy on peace activists in Maryland. Over a 14-month period between 2005 and 2006, undercover state police “repeatedly spied on peace activists and anti-death penalty groups […] and entered the names of some in a law-enforcement database of people thought to be terrorists or drug traffickers.” This was done despite any evidence of criminal activities, according to records made public in 2008.

2007
Pentagon shuts down TALON database. The Pentagon’s Threat and Local Observation Notice (TALON) system, begun in 2003, was meant to collect domestic intelligence on threats to military members and families. However, the TALON database soon became filled with reports of peaceful antiwar protests and tourists snapping photos of bridges. In 2007, Undersecretary of Defense James R. Clapper, Jr., stated that the Pentagon “has assessed the results of the TALON program and does not believe they merit continuing the program as currently constituted, particularly in light of its image in Congress and the media.”

2008
FBI infiltrates Iowa City activist group. In 2008, the FBI infiltrated an activist group in Iowa City and observed law-abiding individuals, collecting detailed information, including what cars they drove and where they worked.

2009
Civilian Army contractor infiltrates Seattle peace group. For two years, a criminal intelligence analyst with the US Army, using a false name, infiltrated and reported on the activities of the Olympia-based anti-war group, Port Militarization Resistance. His identity was accidently discovered after a public records request to the city of Olympia. An investigation into the matter is ongoing.

Add comment

Log in to post comments

Comments

Mr. President,
What has happened to us in the United States of America ? We, in regards to equality, do not up stand our, our 9th Amendment,our United States Bill of Rights, Our United States Constitution. We, in regards to health care, do not up stand our United States Supreme Court findings, Roe vs. Wade. How did we ever get so far off track that we do not respect our United States great Documents ? I urge you bring a screeching halt, an executive order, to this grievous action of our United States Congress once and for all.

Sincere Regards

Roland D. Menard III

This is an ongoing case(personal)......... Since Dec 2002
the US Department of Health and Human Services...Child Services Enforcement Agency uses the Homeland Security Act to prohibit persons seeking lawsuits for agency abuses.

I was warned that I would be detained for making a domestic terrorist threat. If I attempt to file any more lawsuits against the State of Ohio CSEA. This act(warning) was carried out by two law enforcement officials.

Without my authorization, documents have been signed on my behalf. A lawyer was hired who later misrepresented himself. Lawyers in the State of Ohio will not represent a case on my behalf against the CSEA

Without ever having been before the Court (Judge or Jury) all of my bank accounts, taxes, soc sec monies, disability monies, stocks, funds, retirement have all been confiscated. My wife’s Federal Taxes are being confiscated along with Federal checks. (stimulus, overpayment) issued from the US Treasury Department.
My personal documentation, passport, drivers license, soc sec card are now being confiscated. Without personal documentation so goes my voting rights.
I filed for and was granted divorce in 1981 all support monies were paid in full (overpaid) the children are now 32 and 30 with 4 grandchildren.
I have never been summoned to any Court (judge and or jury) for any violations whatsoever regarding this or any other activity. excepting that of local traffic court ( i.e. speeding tickets )

I am at the point of declaring war...
I am being reduced to a non-citizen...
I have written the US Atty Gen. and have been totally disregarded. The same has been for the Sec. of the USDHHS.
and now that my personal document are being seized. I have written the State Department they have failed to acknowledge the situation. I travel frequently (at least 3 times yearly) with my foreign born wife(married in 2002) outside the US.
And now the Government wants to disrupt my family, when there has not been any crime committed.
I have gone as far as written the President of the United States, without acknowledgement from his office. and if I dare say, he lies when he says that the Homeland Security Act is not being used against its citizens.